Clinical Nosology & Multimorbidity

Phenotypes, Taxonomies, and Cross-System Disease

Aims

  • Advance clinical taxonomy for multimorbidity. Develop, compare and validate disease and symptom classifications that bridge mental and physical conditions, capturing clusters, trajectories and endotypes that cut across specialties.
  • Make symptoms and cross-system phenotypes central. Elevate entities such as migrainous vertigo (vestibular migraine) and post-exertional malaise (PEM) as test cases for classification, measurement and clinical pathways.
  • Standardise definitions and data. Harmonise operational criteria, coding (ICD/SNOMED/LOINC/RxNorm), and phenotype algorithms; publish consensus statements and crosswalks.
  • Link taxonomy to care. Show how better classification changes diagnosis, risk stratification, communication, treatment selection, and service design—especially for complex, multimorbid patients.
  • Promote reproducibility and equity. Require transparent methods, sharable phenotype code lists, and analyses across age, sex/gender, ethnicity and resource settings.

Scope

  • Taxonomy & nosology: New or revised case definitions; hierarchical and network-based disease models; phenotype/endotype frameworks. Symptom ontologies and measurement theory (e.g., intensity, duration, post-exertional dynamics, vestibular/aural features).
  • Phenotyping methods: Rule-based and machine-learning phenotypes; cluster/latent class models; graph and trajectory modelling; multimodal data (EHR, wearable, imaging, psychometrics). External validation, transportability, and fairness/bias audits of phenotypes.
  • Multilingual terminology & coding: Crosswalks between ICD/SNOMED and research definitions; term governance; effects of coding choices on epidemiology and service planning. “Data descriptor” articles releasing curated phenotype code lists and implementation recipes.
  • Clinical implementation: Diagnostic pathways, decision tools, and care models for complex patients (e.g., co-occurring anxiety disorders and autonomic dysfunction with vestibular migraine; PEM management across ME/CFS and Long COVID clinics). Impact studies on outcomes, safety, costs and patient-reported measures.
  • Trials & interventions: Interventional studies tailored to multimorbid phenotypes (including N-of-1 and adaptive designs), deprescribing strategies, and integrated psychological-somatic interventions.
  • Policy, ethics and communication: Consequences of reclassification; medico-legal aspects; patient-centred nomenclature; language and stigma in diagnostic labels.

Coming up: 

Long COVID and ME/CFS: is EBV the missing mechanistic bridge?

Who this report is for: 

This report is intended for healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers in the fields of infectious diseases, virology, and public health. It may also be relevant to patients and advocacy groups interested in understanding the connections between Long COVID, ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome), and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) for insights into potential mechanisms, treatments, and policy implications.

 

Join us for research insights on Substack

À paraître : 

Long COVID et ME/CFS : le VEB est-il le pont mécanistique manquant ?

 

À qui s’adresse ce rapport :

Le rapport sur “Long COVID et ME/CFS : le VEB est-il le pont mécanistique manquant ?” est probablement destiné aux professionnels de la santé, chercheurs et décideurs dans les domaines des maladies infectieuses, de la virologie et de la santé publique. Il peut également être pertinent pour les patients et les groupes de défense intéressés par la compréhension des liens entre le Long COVID, le ME/CFS (encéphalomyélite myalgique/syndrome de fatigue chronique) et le virus Epstein-Barr (VEB) pour obtenir des informations sur les mécanismes potentiels, les traitements, et les implications politiques.

 

Rejoignez-nous sur Substack pour des analyses et synthèses de recherche

Próximamente: 

COVID prolongado y EM/SFC: ¿es el VEB el puente mecanicista perdido?

 

Para quién es este informe:

El informe sobre “COVID prolongado y EM/SFC: ¿es el VEB el puente mecanicista perdido?” está probablemente destinado a profesionales de la salud, investigadores y responsables políticos en los campos de las enfermedades infecciosas, virología y salud pública. También puede ser relevante para pacientes y grupos de defensa interesados en comprender las conexiones entre el COVID prolongado, EM/SFC (encefalomielitis miálgica/síndrome de fatiga crónica) y el virus de Epstein-Barr (VEB) para obtener información sobre mecanismos potenciales, tratamientos e implicaciones políticas.

 

Únase a nosotros en Substack para análisis y síntesis de investigación

Information icon

We need your consent to load the translations

We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.